He’s starting to sound more like his dad every day.
Rand Paul blames George W. Bush, not Obama, for ISIS advances in Iraq.
(It’s Bush’s fault.)

National Review reported:

It’s not something you hear from many — if any — of the top-tier potential GOP presidential candidates, but Rand Paul on Sunday said he doesn’t think President Obama has made the U.S. less safe. The 2003 invasion of Iraq is the root of the current chaos in the country, he said, so, as ISIS seizes cities and establishes strongholds across the country, he blames the Bush administration and its Republican supporters.

“What’s going on now I don’t blame on President Obama,” the Kentucky senator told NBC’s David Gregory. “Has he really got the solution? Maybe there is no solution. But I do blame the Iraq war on the chaos that is in the Middle East.”

It looks like the Democrat-media complex has found their new darling.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/06/...advances-video/

Like father, like son. Jabber and Wocky.

These fools in Washington are going to get all of us killed. The fault in Iraq wasn't Bush, and I hate to say this it isn't even Obama (although he can be blamed for aiding and abetting).

The blame belongs on the Jihadists. The Neanderthals who want a worldwide Islamic caliphate and won't rest until they get it. THAT'S where the blame belongs, and until the dunderheads in Washington wake up and smell the coffee we're all at risk. They may not want to vocally declare "war on Islam" but Islam HAS declared war on the west and anyone else who gets in their way.

Until we rise up and start bombing the crap out of every Muslem holy place so these Jihadists are left with no place to pray and certainly no place to rule their caliphate from, this crap will continue no matter who sits in the Oval Office.

Don't worry. It is Monday. That means Rand will hit Hannity today and claim he was misquoted like he does every time he says something stupid about Amnesty or any host of issues.

This guy is a clown.

Quote: algernonpj wrote in post #6

---

Quote: conservgramma wrote in post #3

---

These fools in Washington are going to get all of us killed. The fault in Iraq wasn't Bush, and I hate to say this it isn't even Obama (although he can be blamed for aiding and abetting).

The blame belongs on the Jihadists. The Neanderthals who want a worldwide Islamic caliphate and won't rest until they get it. THAT'S where the blame belongs, and until the dunderheads in Washington wake up and smell the coffee we're all at risk. They may not want to vocally declare "war on Islam" but Islam HAS declared war on the west and anyone else who gets in their way.

Until we rise up and start bombing the crap out of every Muslem holy place so these Jihadists are left with no place to pray and certainly no place to rule their caliphate from, this crap will continue no matter who sits in the Oval Office.

---

See my post.

I do blame both Bush and Obama (and Carter and others). They all have supported 'regime change' that removed strong men who kept the Jihadis in check. They all bowed to the Saudis who finance Jihadis with their oil money. They all preached about 'the religion of peace' (or should that be pieces).

Don't forget Bush, Obama, and Carter are promoters of one world governance. The Nazis and Soviets sent agents into the ME to resurrect violent Jihad as a tool to being down Western Civilization in preparation for wold governance. Bush, Obama and carter (among other) have indirectly continued that work. As I have posted, the only difference I see between Bush and Obama is that Bush wanted a premier place for the US in the new world governance; Obama wants the US brought down to size.

That being said on 9-12 there ought to have been a lot more glass in the Middle East delivered with the warning: 'one more attack on the US and Mecca is next'. Instead we got an EO from Bush instituting the DHS.

---

Zitat

---

It looks like the Democrat-media complex has found their new darling.

---

I'd really, really like to like Rand Paul. I really would. But he's making it next to impossible.

Seems he's more interested in becoming the next John McClown. Maybe Meet the Press needs a new permanent guest once McClown flees the scene.

Quote: Rufus T Firefly wrote in post #8

---

Zitat

---

It looks like the Democrat-media complex has found their new darling.

---

I'd really, really like to like Rand Paul. I really would. But he's making it next to impossible.

Seems he's more interested in becoming the next John McClown. Maybe Meet the Press needs a new permanent guest once McClown flees the scene.

---

I agree. I've tried to like him, and I tried to like his dad. Just not happening...