Why must every change be referred to as a "reform"? Reform implies improvement, which is not always, or never, the case.

Zitat

---

New York state's brand new "bail reform" law proved to be something of an embarrassment last week when a woman, Tiffany Harris, was arrested several times for misdemeanor assault and harassment charges against Jews -- only to be released without bail due to the new law.

This came on the heels of the anti-Semitic machete attack, where five Jews observing Hanukkah were hacked by a deranged anti-Semite.

Naturally, the press had a field day with Mayor Bill de Blasio and Governor Andrew Cuomo -- the two principal architects of the bill. So hizzoner and hizexcellency have beaten a hasty retreat.

Cuomo, who proudly signed the bill into law, blamed the "system" saying, “There’s no doubt that this is a work in progress."

“Changing the system is complicated," he added.

This is especially true when the "change" allows anti-social individuals to roam the city looking for targets for their rage.

Meanwhile, De Blasio stepped in last week and got a judge to order Mrs. Harris off the streets -- which sort of defeats the purpose of the "reforms," but who's noticing?

---

https://pjmedia.com/trending/de-blasio-c...3X3LMBfkbrpXufU

This policy is as stupid as the one adopted in California which eliminates arrests for thefts that are less than $950. In both cases, Liberalism at its finest.