Quote: Cincinnatus wrote in post #1

---

Competent? Well, that leaves Holder out.

Hey, I thought the investigation was about collusion, but, then, what do I know after 2 years of constantly, endlessly, loudly being told it was a collusion investigation.

Zitat

---

Former Attorney General Eric Holder said Friday that any "competent" prosecutor could win an obstruction of justice case against President Trump.

"ANY competent public corruption prosecutor would bring obstruction charges against Trump/and win," Holder tweeted. "Only reason Mueller did not was because of the flawed DOJ restriction against indicting a sitting President. He said so (below). Congress now has a constitutional responsibility."

---

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...ocid=spartanntp

---

It's all about the agenda and promoting/protecting your own, with these Lefties. I don't recall Holder objecting to Comey's refusal, [‘no reasonable prosecutor’] to bring charges against HIllary. In that case there were indeed specific crimes! Failing to press charges against an obvious law-breaker who criminally mishandled emails that included top secret documents, should have resulted in charges before a grand jury.

Funny, I don't recall Holder objecting to Obama claiming Executive Privilege for his documentation, when they were looking into that gun-running fiasco, Fast and Furious. And claiming Executive Privilege is something Donald Trump hasn't done once, so far, and they raided his personal attorney's office before dawn, taking all his files into custody. Who does that? How do they get away with that?

Using the Justice Department to protect one's own favorites was SOP for Obama. It's why he could foolishly brag like this...