American Thinker

Zitat

---

According to the noisy left, Senate Republicans are “traitors” for explaining the Constitutional requirement for the Senate to “advise and consent” on treaties, so that the world and the mullahs will know the truth. Obama’s sole signature cannot commit the United States to surrender to Iranian nuke demands.

The US Constitution insists on the Senate’s “advice and consent” to pass treaties with other nations. That constitutional language is clear and unambiguous.

Only by pretending that Obama’s pending nuclear surrender is an “executive agreement” rather than a treaty can slick media liars evade the clear language of the US Constitution. And if the administration has been lying to the mullahs about the Constitution, their “executive agreement” has been negotiated under false pretenses. In that case Obama owes us a sincere apology, and the pending executive agreement has no force of law.

Obama’s nuclear agreement not a minor matter, not a matter of simple convenience about building an embassy somewhere. It is a treaty in the full meaning of the Constitution, because it opens the door to nuclear escalation around the world.

And if it is a treaty, the Senate’s role of advice and consent requires a 66-vote majority vote.

That’s the obvious truth the Democrats are squirming to dodge. This is a constitutional treaty!

What’s more, by bringing that ticklish word “treason” into the public debate, the left is opening up a can of worms. We can now ask some crucial questions that have been taboo until now.
•Does Hillary Clinton’s personal aide Huma Abedin, a lifelong Muslim Brotherhood acolyte, represent a clear and present danger in time of war?
•Did Hillary Clinton knowingly allow Abedin access to top secret State Department documents via Hillary’s private email accounts?”

And, to echo Prince Turki al-Faisal this week,
•Is Obama now opening the door to nuclear proliferation to rogues and terrorists, by letting Iran have nuclear weapons, thereby betraying this country, our allies and the entire world?

Those questions must now be asked. They should be asked as a matter of national survival.

Hair-splitters will argue whether the technical term “treason” applies since the US Congress no longer goes to the trouble of declaring war against our deadly enemies. That is because Congress has withdrawn from its constitutional responsibilities in war and peace.

But the Constitution is not a suicide pact, and if individuals aid and abet the enemy in a time of war, they might still be held responsible.

---

A good article IMO.

You know, now that the treason-ice has been broken, it might be time to use it.

The Mossad needs to find that Kenyan Birth Certificate ......... and save us the effort of deposing this Tyrant !!

w

Quote: FWP wrote in post #3

---

The Mossad needs to find that Kenyan Birth Certificate ......... and save us the effort of deposing this Tyrant !!

w

---