The New York Times Was Unable To Corroborate Second Kavanaugh Accuser’s Story
10:12 AM 09/24/2018
Amber Athey | Media and Breaking News Editor

The New York Times reported on Sunday that it was unable to corroborate the claims of a second accuser who says Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh exposed himself to her in college.

Deborah Ramirez alleges that Kavanaugh thrust his penis into her face while she was drunk at a Yale University dormitory party. The New Yorker ran with Ramirez’s allegation on Sunday despite being unable to produce any firsthand witnesses or confirm that Kavanaugh was at the party where the incident was said to have occurred.

The New York Times noted several paragraphs deep in a report that it chose not to report on Ramirez’s allegation because of a lack of corroborating evidence.

“The Times had interviewed several dozen people over the past week in an attempt to corroborate her story, and could find no one with firsthand knowledge,” the NYT’s Sheryl Gay Stolberg and Nicholas Fandos reported. “Ms. Ramirez herself contacted former Yale classmates asking if they recalled the incident and told some of them that she could not be certain Mr. Kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself.”

.........................................................

http://dailycaller.com/2018/09/24/new-yo...anaugh-accuser/

Quote: Cincinnatus wrote in post #2

---

Both accusations, and a possible third from ambulance chaser Avenatti, are complete bull and the Democrats know it. Their purpose is to delay the vote by demanding an FBI investigation, thereby meaning no vote in this Congressional session. The Democrats hope they will win a Senate majority for the next session and then can bury the Kavanaugh nomination forever.

This is the most cynical and disgusting political move I have ever witnessed, worse even than the hatchet job attempted on Clarence Thomas. To destroy a decent man's reputation just for political gain is unconscionable. The Democrats are truly despicable.

---