Obama SOTU Speech Full Of Lies; Even Liberal Commentators Crying Foul
By Joseph R. Carducci, January 21, 2015.
As I reported earlier, Obama was planning to use the forum he was granted in giving his annual State of the Union speech (SOTU) as a way to try and force the conversation and debate for the 2016 presidential race. While he might have done this to a degree, it was not nearly as good of a performance as I had hoped.
Even Liberals Can’t Buy Obama’s Lies
In fact, Obama said so many lies, half truths, and untruths during this speech that even the normally apologetic liberal media commentators could not pretend to accept. One area of stark contrast between what Obama said and what the media thought is in foreign policy, specifically the war against the Islamic State. Here is a video that shows the disconnect between Obama and commentators Chris Matthews and Andrea Mitchell, last night on MSNBC:
I also found it interesting that Matthews brought up the point about how Obama still won’t call this group the Islamic State, preferring instead the term ISIL, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The Levant, by the way, includes Israel. This means Obama is referring to the aspirations by the Islamic State to eventually take control of the entire region, including Israel.
Obama Disconnected From the Real World
Both commentators also found Obama to be disconnected from the real world. Listen to Andrea Mitchell once again:
The only reason they are calling out Zero as a fraud is because they all have fevered chills of Hitlary. The MSM now sits at their desks all day staring at a picture of her daydreaming about how wonderful it will be to have Slick and her back in charge.