Ask and you shall receive, conservatives—we’re suing the President again!

Texas Governor-Elect Greg Abbott is leading a 17-state coalition in a lawsuit challenging the legality of President Obama’s plan to grant executive amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants currently residing within our borders.

There are three main parts to the lawsuit: first, that Obama’s Executive Action violates the power-limiting “Take Care” Clause of the Constitution; second, that the Administration ignored required rulemaking procedures; and third, that if allowed to go into effect, the order will “exacerbate the humanitarian crisis along the southern border, which will affect increased state investment in law enforcement, health care and education.”

Both Texas Governor Rick Perry and Governor Elect Abbott have experience dealing with both the problems illegal immigration presents to the country, and suing the Executive over federal overreach.

Via the Associated Press:

Abbott said Obama’s actions “directly violate a fundamental promise to the American people” and that it was up to the president to “execute the law, not de facto make law.”

Republican presidents, including Ronald Reagan, have issued past executive orders pertaining to immigration. Abbott said those were in response to actions by Congress — unlike Obama, who Abbott said acted in lieu of congressional approval.

…

Potential 2016 presidential candidate and current Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who leaves office in January, also spoke out against the executive order earlier Wednesday, saying it could trigger a new flood of people pouring across the Texas-Mexico border and create chaos that could be exploited by drug- and people-smugglers.


Perry said hours before Abbott’s announcement that Obama’s 2012 executive order delaying the deportation of children brought into the U.S. illegally by their parents triggered an unprecedented wave of unaccompanied minors and families, mostly from Central America, crossing into the U.S. this summer.

“In effect, his action placed a neon sign on our border, assuring people that they could ignore the law of the United States,” said Perry, who has deployed up to 1,000 National Guard troops to the border.

In the video below, Abbott makes a great point about the “prosecutorial discretion” argument currently being floated by both the Administration and supporters of the law. The reason that this isn’t simply “prosecutorial discretion” coming down from the White House is that the President isn’t simply making the decision to not prosecute—he’s granting rights and benefits to people who are breaking the law:

SNIP-

Read more:http://legalinsurrection.com/2014/12/17-...·tion%29

Good! I'm all for suing him as much as possible.

Every day. Morning, noon and night, @Sanguine.

Quote: Sanguine wrote in post #2

---

Good! I'm all for suing him as much as possible.

---

Although this could have a backfire effect. Knowing Obama, he would just use taxpayer dollars to cover all legal fees and financial obligations.

If on the other hand he is forced to use his own money -- then SUE THE PANTS OFF HIM!

Quote: Frank Cannon wrote in post #4

---

Quote: Sanguine wrote in post #2

---

Good! I'm all for suing him as much as possible.

---

What? Are you a lawyer?

---