Michael Barone | Nov 07, 2014
Some observations on the election:

(1) This was a wave, folks. It will be a benchmark for judging waves, for either party, for years.

(2) In seriously contested races, Republican candidates were generally younger, more vigorous, more sunny and optimistic than Democrats. The contrast was sharpest in Colorado and Iowa, which voted twice for President Obama. Cory Gardner and Joni Ernst seemed to be looking forward to the future. Their opponents grimly championed the stale causes of feminists and trial lawyers of the past.

Democrats see themselves as the party of the future. But their policies are antique. The federal minimum wage dates to 1938, equal pay for women to 1963, access to contraceptives to 1965. Raising these issues now is campaign gimmickry, not serious policymaking.

Democratic leading lights have been around a long time. The party's two congressional leaders are in their 70s. The governors of the two largest Democratic states are sons of former governors who won their first statewide elections in 1950 and 1978.

This has implications for 2016. Hillary Clinton, the likely Democratic nominee, worked in her first campaign in 1970. She has been a national figure since 1991. The Clintons' theme song, "Don't Stop Thinking About Tomorrow," was released in 1977. That will be 39 years ago in 2016.

(3) The combination of Obama's low job approval and Harry Reid's virtual shutdown of the Senate insured a Republican Senate majority. Reid prevented amendments -- Mark Begich of Alaska never got to introduce one -- that could have helped them in campaigns.

Votes were blocked on issues with clear Senate majorities -- such as the Keystone XL pipeline, medical device tax repeal and the bipartisan patent reform bill backed by Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.

That left Democrats running for re-election stuck with 95-plus percent Obama voting records. It left them with no independent votes or initiatives to point to. Reid kept Democratic candidates well-stocked with money. But not with winning issues.

(4) Democratic territory has been reduced to the bastions of two core groups -- black voters and gentry liberals. Democrats win New York City and the San Francisco Bay area by overwhelming margins, but are outvoted in almost all the territory in between -- including, this year, Obama's Illinois. Gov. Jerry Brown ran well behind in California's Central Valley, and Gov. Andrew Cuomo lost most of upstate New York.

Democratic margins have shrunk among Hispanics and, almost to the vanishing point, among young voters. Liberal Democrats raised money to "turn Texas blue." But it voted Republican by wider than usual margins this year.

for more see:
http://townhall.com/columnists/michaelba...medium=facebook

Quote: Frank Cannon wrote in post #2

---

Zitat

---

This has implications for 2016. Hillary Clinton, the likely Democratic nominee,

---

Does anyone really believe that? I sure as shit don't. She just lost all the elections she went to campaign for. She doesn't have the hearts of the you punks that put Zero into office. The Rat nominee will be someone we have never heard of. Clean slates for for them.

---

Seems they have to play the expectation out. She's the heir apparent but she's a has been as well. The outlook is grim for her. They're just giving her the modicum of respect until her crown is jilted. She's not presidential material.