December 23, 2016
Heir to British throne urges subjects to think about Mohammed at Christmastime
By Thomas Lifson

Prince Charles, who is slated to be the formal head of the Church of England, is behaving like a proper dhimmi, spouting P.C. nonsense. Justin Holcomb reports on Townhall:

While speaking on the British radio show "Thought for the Day," the future King of Britain, Prince Charles, said that Christians should be more mindful of Islam and Muhammad during the holidays.

"Normally at Christmas we think of the Birth of our Lord Jesus Christ. I wonder though if this year we might emember how the story of the nativity unfolds, with the fleeing of the holy family to escape violent persecution. And we might also remember that when the prophet Muhammad migrated from Mecca to Medina he was seeking the freedom for himself and his followers to worship.

Whichever religious path we follow, the destination is the same – to value and respect the other person, accepting their right to live out their peaceful response to the love of God," he said.

This is wrong on so many counts. Mohammed wasn’t seeking freedom; he was seeking the ability to rule and coerce others to worship his way. He was expelled – he didn’t migrate – and freedom was not what he sought. “Islam” means “submission,” and that is the very opposite of “freedom.”

And no, despite all the liberal pabulum, the destination of all religions is not the same. Islam specifically seeks a global theocracy. Some religions liberate, while others enslave.

Can Queen Elizabeth just skip over Charles and award the throne to her grandson as she abdicates?

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016...istmastime.html

Pnnce Charles ought to stick to talking to his plants

Quote: april wrote in post #7

---

Long live the queen! Go straight to William please. Proof inbreeding is wrong.

---