Gateway Pundit via MSNBC

Zitat

---

Donald Trump spokesperson Katrina Pierson finally spilled the beans on Heidi Cruz.
“Her entire career has been spent working against everything Ted Cruz says he stands for.”

---

And that too is fact -- Goldman Sacs, CFR, the North American Union and so on.

We just need some patience TM. Truth will eventually come out with these types of stories. I remember back when NE first outed Edwards it was a slow drip drip. He denied it, then another story, he denied again, then more evidence. I really don't think NE would have ran with this if they didn't have something in their backpockets yet to release.

Could be a video they are waiting to release. For right now they've got everybody's attention waiting for the next drop.

We'll see.

FWIW

As I drove tonight I was listening to Michael Savage. He stated he has a friend who used to work for NE and this individual, the friend, contacted his sources at NE who told him the story of Cruz affairs is bogus, and cleverly designed to avoid any legal difficulties by using innuendo, qualifiers, and the like.

So make of that what you will.

I definitely don't trust the GOPe. They could be trying to get rid of both Cruz and Trump with this so they get to a brokered convention and then nominate their own guy.

Quote: Cincinnatus wrote in post #5

---

FWIW

As I drove tonight I was listening to Michael Savage. He stated he has a friend who used to work for NE and this individual, the friend, contacted his sources at NE who told him the story of Cruz affairs is bogus, and cleverly designed to avoid any legal difficulties by using innuendo, qualifiers, and the like.

So make of that what you will.

---

Okay guys, I'll come clean. Yesterday I BOUGHT the damn rag. (I know, I know...but sorry, if you want to evaluate you gotta review the evidence. That's the way it works.)

Here is my take.

IMO, the text of the article is full of a whole lot of nothing. Except for highlighting Roger Stone's observations about the rumors (and he certainly has a right to comment, as we all do), the NE lists "political operatives" and cites "rumors," "leaks," and reports from OTHER websites. I'm reading words like "supposedly," "alleged," "may have" and "according to a source." All third, fourth, and fifth party hearsay.

This is the part I find compelling...the blurred photos of the women. There are NO HEADINGS over or under their images, and NO REFERENCE TO THE PICTURES WITHIN THE ARTICLE ITSELF. In other words, the reader is left to wonder who these women are, and may logically infer (since there are 5 images) that these must be the "5 Mistresses" to which the article refers.

From what I read, I agree with Savage's friend. The NE is doing the old bob-and-weave and really dancing around the edges of libel here. True, they didn't name anyone and they blurred these images.

But what about the very reasonable expectation that these images could become "unblurred" with relative ease? Shouldn't the code of journalistic standards, such that they are, warn them that they are playing with fire? (I know...you're laughing, aren't you?)

All I can say is, based on what I saw with my own eyes, the NE must really like living dangerously.

Now having said all that, if this turns out to be a head fake, and there really is some "there" there...well, then Katie Bar the Door.

But until that day, having reviewed the "evidence"...all I can say is that is seems like one big Hit Piece to me.

Zitat

---

Hasn't Savage been a pretty staunch DT supporter? I think I read that.

---

He has indeed been a supporter in the past. He is also most probably bipolar and definitely a Drama Queen (but fun to listen to regardless) so I'm not sure it's really a matter of much importance.

BTW, in no way did he imply that he no longer supported DT. Just that he really hates NE tactics and wants him to come out swinging against them.

In another setting we might call that a shakedown...but that's JMO.