I'm sure everyone has noticed a sudden spate of stories questioning Dr Carson's veracity on a number of issues: his opinion on the purposes of the pyramids, whether he really received an offer of a scholarship to West Point, who was it he supposedly tried to stab, and so forth.
Interesting how all this has just suddenly burst on the scene, but I am particularly taken by Matt Walsh's perspective on all this:
ZitatThat said, the real story here is the story we've all seen play out a million times before. It's the story of a profoundly corrupt and morally bankrupted media. These hacks never spent one minute -- not one single minute -- looking into Obama's past. The Clintons have been embroiled in scandal after scandal after scandal for their entire political careers, and yet all of their lies and felonies have been treated like irrelevant little details. Carson's West Point scholarship or youthful improprieties dominate entire news cycle, while the crimes of Clinton and Obama are ignored. Bill Clinton was credibly accused of RAPE -- not just "affairs," rape -- and Hillary helped silence and intimidate his accusers, and none of that ever got an ounce of the coverage Carson's pyramid theories received.
How I loathe our "media", often even more than our politicians.
"How I loathe our "media", often even more than our politicians."
We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." -- David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991
Quote: algernonpj wrote in post #3"How I loathe our "media", often even more than our politicians."
We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." -- David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991
Quote: algernonpj wrote in post #3"How I loathe our "media", often even more than our politicians."
We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." -- David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991
ZitatThe way in which Rockefeller’s remarks were made public ironically illustrates the power elite’s chokehold on the mass media. Excerpts from Rockefeller’s opening address were leaked to two independent French publications. They then came to the attention of Hilaire du Berrier, an international correspondent living in Monaco, who published them in his newsletter, HduB Reports. As he relayed Rockefeller’s breathtakingly brazen admissions to his readers, du Berrier knowingly commented that he would “lay odds that not a word of Mr. Rockefeller’s speech will be reported in America.” As far as the major media are concerned, du Berrier’s prediction came true.
Wiki posts links to the three publications:
ZitatAccording to various internet sources, the French publications were Minute, 19 June 1991, and Lectures Françaises, July/August 1991 and it was the HduB Reports of September, 1991 which republished the quote. I haven't been able to verify any of this myself. Here are links to the periodicals, in case anybody in France wants to go to the bibliothèque. I'm not absolute sure that this Minute is the correct one. · Lectures Françaises, ISSN 0024-0133 · Minute, ISSN 1243-7751 · H du B Reports, OCLC 14202455 or 9031105
Minute changed name several times and there are different ISSN's for the different names. For the period January 1991 - January 1993 (which includes the issue of interest) it was called La France or Minute - La France, with ISSN 1156-4007. And the here's the catalog record at the Bibliothèque Nationale, just in case someone wants to go scan the article https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:David...ller#Bilderberg
Dennis Laurence Cuddy, historian and political analyst, received a Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (major in American History, minor in political science). Dr. Cuddy has taught at the university level, has been a political and economic risk analyst for an international consulting firm, and has been a Senior Associate with the U.S. Department of Education http://www.newswithviews.com/education/education5.htm