Exclusive: Joseph Farah explains why Dems, media give 'advice' to GOP


I don’t get it.

Why are Democrats giving advice to the Republicans about how dangerous Donald Trump is to the GOP plans for capturing the White House?

Does that make sense?

If you were a Democrat, and you really believed Donald Trump posed a toxic threat to Republican efforts to regain the presidency, why would you warn the GOP about their folly?

Something doesn’t make sense here.

Do you know what I mean?

The establishment media’s at it, too.

We all know how what we euphemistically call “the mainstream media” are really a bunch of partisan Democrat jackals, right? Why are they issuing minute-by-minute alerts to the GOP about how Trump threatens a thousand years of darkness for the Republicans?

I don’t believe anything they say.

Now, look, Donald Trump would not be my designer candidate for reclaiming America after eight years of insidious and relentless attack from inside the Oval Office.

But he is earning broad-based support because his message is resonating with the American people. For all I know, his poll numbers are sky high because he’s energizing citizens who have given up on choosing between Tweedle-Dee and Tweedle-Dumber over the past few election cycles.

I don’t believe for a minute he’s destroying the GOP. The establishment GOP has done an extraordinary job of doing that without any help from Donald Trump. Right now, he looks like a shot of adrenaline to me.

But still the media and the Democrats and the far-out leftists give their advice to their so-called political adversaries:

CNN, that bastion of media fairness, puts it this way: Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton leads Jeb Bush, 50 percent to 44 percent, in a head-to-head match-up. But throw an independent Trump into that race, and Clinton’s lead grows significantly to 46 percent, leaving Bush at 30 percent.

Of course, that suggests that we care whether Bush loses to Hillary Clinton by 6 percent or 16 percent. I personally couldn’t care less how much Bush loses by. The point is, he can’t win. He’s a loser for sure. Even if he wins, we lose. So, thanks, but I’ll take this advice from CNN with a grain of salt.

Think about it this way: If Bush does steal the Republican nomination, wouldn’t you at least like a protest vote option? Wouldn’t you like to have a third-party candidate in the race with $9 billion dollars to spend who has a real chance at getting 40 percent of the vote and winning? Understand that neither Hillary nor Bush is popular. Trump is on fire before a single primary vote has been cast.

Again, let me make this clear: I am not endorsing Trump, but I am very grateful to him for entering this race and energizing it, raising issues bluntly and fearlessly that scare the daylights out of other Republican candidates.

This is a good thing.

What’s the downside?

For more: http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/the-war-on-tr...lBvsVPM9Ud1Z.99

More evidence that the Uniparty is overtaking American politics.