"What we see here is, I think, a harbinger of things to come. The Left is mobilized and on the march, and has no intention of taking any prisoners. Anyone who thinks some kind of accommodation or compromise can be reached with these people is mistaken. They are vicious bullies, and must be dealt with accordingly."

I'm not so sure I completely believe the narrative happened just like that. The guy was forced to leave his company after one week of gay fury? It sounds pretty wimpy to me.

BUT!!!
Isn't it becoming more and more clear that the tactics of the Left lack any appreciation for political discourse? The Left is heading away from freedom, away from any appreciation for diverse thinking and into totalitarian/dictatorial thought. Agree with them or you are a bigot!!!

So, what's ahead? Tyranny. When the Left gets in power we will be led by tyrants, convinced that they're right and everyone else is full of sh%%. Look at the dialogue recently on the Supreme Court over birth control and Hobby Lobby. The three wenches losing their minds, showing that it's not about the law anymore, even on the Supreme Court. It's about promoting the Leftist ideology.

Such disdain for the process of arriving at the truth has never been part of mainstream-accepted America. It's been the method of the fringe groups, always held in check by the sane majority. Now it is different. We are heading into the arms of anti-Christ thinking and acting.

found at:
http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/2014/04/0...f-brendan-eich/

Andrew Sullivan: "The whole episode disgusts me – as it should disgust anyone interested in a tolerant and diverse society. If this is the gay rights movement today – hounding our opponents with a fanaticism more like the religious right than anyone else – then count me out. If we are about intimidating the free speech of others, we are no better than the anti-gay bullies who came before us."

You travel with unguided souls Mr. Sullivan.

One reader's response to his piece:
"I’m going to disagree with you, quite strongly, about the resignation of Brendan Eich. While I agree that he is certainly entitled to his point of view, and to take actions in support of that point of view, he is not entitled to face no consequences from those actions. That’s all this is: consequences. If he truly has the strength of his convictions, he will consider this a necessary sacrifice."

Their relation to power seethes of totalitarianism but they don't see it.

"Monetary support to reduce fellow citizens to second-class status should not be enshrined as “protected speech.”

This is what you get when unguided souls assume power. The idea that he is violating another person's right to coexist with a different opinion doesn't compute.

Andrew Sullivan's response to the above comment: "What we have here is a social pressure to keep your beliefs deeply private for fear of retribution. We are enforcing another sort of closet on others. I can barely believe the fanaticism."