Trump's latest sin is to point out bias on the part of Judge Curiel who ought to have recused himself. Trump's 'racism' was all over the morning news. There was nary a mention of La Raza, MEChA, nor Aztlán.


Judge, law firm bringing Trump U case both tied to La Raza
Curiel awarded scholarship to illegal immigrant
2016.06.06
Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., is a WND senior staff writer. He has authored many books, including No. 1 N.Y. Times best-sellers "The Obama Nation" and "Unfit for Command." Corsi's latest book is "Partners in Crime."

NEW YORK – The federal judge presiding over the Trump University class action lawsuit is a member of the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association, a group that while not a branch of the National Council of La Raza, has ties to the controversial organization, which translates literally “The Race.”

U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel, who has been criticized by Donald Trump as a “hater” appointed by President Obama who should be recused from the case, listed his membership in the “La Raza Lawyers of San Diego” on a judicial questionnaire he filled out when he was selected to be a federal judge. He was named in a brochure as a member of the selection committee for the organization’s 2014 Annual Scholarship Fund Dinner & Gala. Meanwhile, the San-Diego based law firm representing the plaintiffs in the Trump University case, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, was listed as a sponsor of the event.

WND reported the San Diego firm paid $675,000 to the Clintons for speeches, and the firm’s founder is a wealthy San Diego lawyer who served a two-year sentence in federal prison for his role in a kickback scheme to mobilize plaintiffs for class-action lawsuits.

While critics of Trump have argued that the San Diego La Raza Lawyers’ association is not affiliated with the National Council of La Raza, consider the following:

Also:

La Raza Judge Gonzalo Curiel and the Hispanic National Bar Association…
Posted on June 7, 2016 by sundance

The curriculum vitae of Trump University Judge Gonzalo Curiel specifically mentions his affiliation with the Hispanic National Bar Association, or HNBA.



The Hispanic National Bar Association published a press release on July 2nd 2015 which specifically stated their intention to target the “business interests” of Donald Trump:



Full July 2nd Press Release available HERE

Recap:

This is just getting better and better:


San Jose Police Chief Who Admits ALLOWING ATTACKS on Trump Supporters is Affiliated With La Raza
Police chief Eddie Garcia is affiliated with the far left group La Raza.
Pamela Geller — June 7, 2016
http://freedomoutpost.com/san-jose-polic...d-with-la-raza/

Paul Ryan calls Trump's attack on Mexican-American judge a 'textbook definition of a racist comment' but insists Hillary Clinton isn't 'the answer' – as Chris Christie rushes to defend The Donald over legal 'kerfuffle'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...-kerfuffle.html

Mr low energy jumps in
Jeb Bush calls on Trump to retract his judge attacks
By Nolan D. McCaskill
06/07/16 05:59 PM EDT
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/je...mp-judge-224022

Cruz to NBC: Trump 'Inappropriate to Attack a Judge's Race or Ethnicity'
http://www.nbcnews.com/card/cruz-nbc-tru...hnicity-n586746


Kirk unendorses
Kirk Tweets That He Will Not Support Donald Trump
June 7, 2016 3:04 PM
http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2016/06/07/k...t-donald-trump/

OTH
Sotomayor's comment about Latina women versus white men
By Robert Farley on Wednesday, May 27th, 2009 at 2:20 p.m.

If you've been following the story of Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor via cable news, you've undoubtedly heard this sound bite from a 2001 Sotomayor speech:

"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

For many conservative detractors, the quote has formed the centerpiece of their opposition.

In a released statement, Wendy E. Long, counsel to the Judicial Confirmation Network, a conservative nonprofit, said, "Judge Sotomayor is a liberal judicial activist of the first order who thinks her own personal political agenda is more important than the law as written. She thinks that judges should dictate policy, and that one’s sex, race and ethnicity ought to affect the decisions one renders from the bench."

Previously, we have looked at the issue of Sotomayor's statement about judges making policy . Here we look at the claim that Sotomayor thinks "that one’s sex, race and ethnicity ought to affect the decisions one renders from the bench."

A number of Republicans have expressed concern about the statement.

Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., said that due to Sotomayor's comments, the Senate will need to weigh "her ability to rule fairly without undue influence from her own personal race, gender or political preferences."

On his blog, Newt Gingrich wrote this about Sotomayor's nomination: "Imagine a judicial nominee said 'my experience as a white man makes me better than a Latina woman' Wouldn't they have to withdraw? New racism is no better than old racism. A white man racist nominee would be forced to withdraw. Latina woman racist should also withdraw."

Asked repeatedly about Sotomayor's comments during the daily White House press briefing on May 27, 2009, spokesman Robert Gibbs admonished reporters not to make a judgment on an 8-second sound clip from a 40-minute speech. Gibbs said he was confident that when people looked at the totality of Sotomayor's speech, and the context of the comment in question, they would "come to a reasonable conclusion on this."

..................................................

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/...rsus-white-men/