American Apparel is laying off hundreds of workers and retooling its production process — and may start making some of its clothing outside Los Angeles.
The downtown L.A. company began layoffs last week. So far, about 500 local employees have lost their jobs, said Nativo Lopez, a senior advisor with Hermandad Mexicana, which is helping workers in unionizing efforts. The company has about 4,600 employees in Southern California.
American Apparel emerged from bankruptcy in February and has been trying to move past a tumultuous two years that saw the ouster of founder Dov Charney, store closures and massive fire sales to clear unsold merchandise.
In a letter to employees last week, Chief Executive Paula Schneider blamed the workforce reduction on a “redesign of our production process” that will include making fewer garments throughout the year to cut down on inventory that eventually has to be discounted.
Schneider also hinted that the manufacturing of more complicated pieces, such as jeans, could soon be outsourced to a third-party company — though she stressed that the products “will still be American-made.”
Manufacturing all of its colorful leggings, knit tops and accessories in Los Angeles has been a cornerstone of American Apparel, set in place years ago by Charney, a staunch immigration and fair wages advocate. After his firing, the company has been moving away from its roots by distancing itself from its outspoken former chief executive, toning down its racy billboards and now rethinking one of its fundamental tenets about how and where its products are made.
The company said only a fraction of its garments would potentially be outsourced, according to last week’s letter that was obtained by The Times.
But analysts said this was probably the company’s first step in leaving Los Angeles, at least when it comes to manufacturing.
“They’re headed out of Dodge,” said Lloyd Greif, chief executive of Los Angeles investment banking firm Greif & Co. “They are going to outsource all garments. It’s only a matter of time.”
American Apparel appears to be dropping the bad news a little at a time, he said, to gauge public opinion and also to prevent a worker revolt.
“They might be kind of testing the waters to see what the market reaction is,” Greif said.
So far, the company will only say that it is considering farming out the making of complicated garments that take a lot of labor but comprise a small slice of the company’s business.
snip
“They are doing exactly what American Apparel fought against,” Charney said. He said he had always resisted “outsourcing and searching for ways to pay people less money.”
American Apparel declined to comment.
In the letter, Schneider said shaking up the production process came after “months of careful and rigorous review.”
“We have streamlined the number of items we display in each of our stores,” she wrote. “Earlier this year, we closed a number of stores to focus on our best-selling locations.”
Lopez, the labor organizer, said the general mood among workers is “doom and gloom.”
Laid-off employees were given a severance package of two months' pay. They also were offered an additional $800 if they waived their right to file any claims against the company, Lopez said.
Since it emerged from Chapter 11, the company has appointed new board members, including Susan Davidson, chief executive of Zac Posen and fashion boutique Scoop.
******* “We cannot continue to allow ourselves to be influenced and molded by the political class and by the media. That is going to destroy us," he said, remarking that it's "kind of sad" that the press is the only business protected by the Constitution "because they were supposed to be the allies of the people." Dr. Ben Carson
The issue of raising the minimum wage is a major red herring. It ignores the question of manipulation of the job market by flooding the country with both legal and illegal labor. The fact that supply and demand affect the job market is ignored. This manipulation is promoted by global corporate, the Chamber of Congress and politicians on their payrolls. It is justified by the mantra 'jobs Americans can't / won't do'.
IMHO minimum wage is one issue in which the internationalists have set the terms of the discussion. It is one of those facts about employment that was true once upon a time. Just like the argument that if you are long term unemployed you really aren't looking.
Over the last decades there has been major interference in and manipulation of the market for jobs at all levels of the market. Government Internationalists / collectivists have worked in concert with global corporate to suppress wages and job opportunities for Americans. Their tools include out sourcing, in sourcing, wide open borders, 'Free Trade' agreements that mandate x number of guest workers regardless of the job market, tolerance, encouragement even, of the presence of illegal aliens,and manipulated economic statistics. A little known fact is that the fastest growing segment of illegal aliens is visa overstays, think H-1B visas.
To make the minimum wage issue even worse most jobs being created as the result of open borders, immigration policy, and 'free trade' agreements are part time and minimum wage. This situation guarantees escalating government dependence.
It has been estimated that if the labor market and economic statistics were not manipulated the minimum wage would be $12 - $15 per hour.
From Phyllis Schlafly: Minimum Wage and Welfare: the Tradeoff "But raising the minimum wage may actually be worth considering if it has the side benefit of cutting the gigantic total of our hidden welfare programs." http://www.eagleforum.org/publications/c...e-tradeoff.html
Of course for this to work immigration policies would need to enforced and designed to benefit the people of the US not government and global corporate.