#1 White House Tries To Clarify Rice's 'Bergdahl Served With Honor and Distinction' Comments by ThirstyMan 05.06.2014 07:16

avatar

here's the controversial "honor and distinction" piece....




here's the "clarification"....

An administration official now tells Fox that Rice meant that we should not forget that Bergdahl was serving his country in general”

“She was referring to the fact that he was over there as a U.S. soldier, volunteered for service, and remember has just endured five years of brutal captivity; she wasn’t necessarily trying to characterize the circumstances of his capture which she said we’d have to learn more about; and let’s not get ahead of the facts that we don’t know yet, we haven’t heard his side of the story yet.”

for the BOR perspective...

Is Susan Rice a Moron?
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlic...mments-n1847766

#2 RE: White House Tries To Clarify Rice's 'Bergdahl Served With Honor and Distinction' Comments by ThirstyMan 05.06.2014 07:40

avatar

More smoke being blow up our asses!

"Sgt Bergdahl wasn't simply a hostage, he was an American prisoner of war captured on the battlefield"

#3 RE: White House Tries To Clarify Rice's 'Bergdahl Served With Honor and Distinction' Comments by PzLdr 05.06.2014 09:08

avatar

Let me guess. Bergdahl was captured as the result of a video...

#4 RE: White House Tries To Clarify Rice's 'Bergdahl Served With Honor and Distinction' Comments by ThirstyMan 05.06.2014 09:15

avatar

They're desperately trying to control the language of who we're fighting and what just happened.

Imagine, all these lives lost and the Taliban are not even listed as a terrorist organization by the Dept of State?

#5 RE: White House Tries To Clarify Rice's 'Bergdahl Served With Honor and Distinction' Comments by Cincinnatus 05.06.2014 14:57

avatar

Really? "remember has just endured five years of brutal captivity"

Prove it.

This Rice woman has made herself into a national buffoon.

Xobor Create your own Forum with Xobor